Compare
RailGuard vs the alternatives
Card limits, expense reviews and in-code checks all leave gaps when an AI agent is the one spending. Here's where each tool fits — and what a dedicated governance layer adds.
Ramp
A finance platform for company spend — cards, budgets and expense flows. Ramp's agent cards bring agent purchases into that program, but controls are scoped to Ramp's rails and its approval flows are built for people, not for agents that need a machine-readable decision in milliseconds.
Use it as a rail under RailGuard's policy layer.
Stripe Issuing
Payment infrastructure with card-level spending controls and credentials for agentic commerce. It can cap what a card can do, but it doesn't know the agent's reasoning, route an out-of-policy request to a named approver, or keep a governance-grade audit trail of why each payment was allowed.
Use it as a rail under RailGuard's policy layer.
In-code guardrails
Budget checks inside your agent's own code. Quick to start, but they share the agent's trust domain — a prompt change or refactor can silently remove them, and there's no independent record of what was checked or why. Finance and compliance have to take the agent's word for it.
Replace with a server-side checkpoint your agent can't edit.